A migration release completed successfully. The services were healthy and data checks had produced useful evidence. The customer’s authenticated journey had not yet been accepted, however. Those were two different results, even though both appeared in updates about the same release.
The Duva thread kept the deployment receipt, data checks and unfinished acceptance work together. When the owner decided that the technical verification could be recorded separately, that decision was written down too. The release record could then say what engineering had established and who owned the remaining customer checks.
Give each kind of evidence its own status. A release handoff might say: “Deployed version: confirmed. Service health: checked. Data reconciliation: linked. Customer journey: awaiting acceptance by the named owner.” This is an illustrative format. It lets a reader see exactly which result is green and which result still needs a person to verify it.